<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gold SEO Tips! &#8211; How Google rates links from Sites Such as Facebook &amp; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardbaldock.com/guaranteed-seo/seo-how-does-google-rate-links-from-sites-such-as-facebook-twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardbaldock.com/guaranteed-seo/seo-how-does-google-rate-links-from-sites-such-as-facebook-twitter</link>
	<description>Succeed Online. Checkout Rocking Guaranteed Search Engine Optimization &#38; Traffic Promotion Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Warriner</title>
		<link>http://richardbaldock.com/guaranteed-seo/seo-how-does-google-rate-links-from-sites-such-as-facebook-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Warriner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardbaldock.com/?p=651#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,

I am actually not clear what you are explaining here. I do understand that Google treats all links the same with respect to PR and if the links are crawled and not no-followed.

So is it a complete and utter fallacy that as a general rule links from .edu and .gov sites are more likely to hold more weight with Google? While specific .gov and .edu&#039;s may not?

If I may suggest, when working on back-links the focus should be on obtaining targeted relevant traffic. Some of which will help your ranking while others may only drive some traffic, but that is the purpose of getting rank.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>I am actually not clear what you are explaining here. I do understand that Google treats all links the same with respect to PR and if the links are crawled and not no-followed.</p>
<p>So is it a complete and utter fallacy that as a general rule links from .edu and .gov sites are more likely to hold more weight with Google? While specific .gov and .edu&#8217;s may not?</p>
<p>If I may suggest, when working on back-links the focus should be on obtaining targeted relevant traffic. Some of which will help your ranking while others may only drive some traffic, but that is the purpose of getting rank.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO</title>
		<link>http://richardbaldock.com/guaranteed-seo/seo-how-does-google-rate-links-from-sites-such-as-facebook-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardbaldock.com/?p=651#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I’m re-thinking what I thought I knew before reading this. Thanks for a well written piece that breaks through the fog to present a clear picture on a fascinating subject. [editted].............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m re-thinking what I thought I knew before reading this. Thanks for a well written piece that breaks through the fog to present a clear picture on a fascinating subject. [editted]&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://richardbaldock.com/guaranteed-seo/seo-how-does-google-rate-links-from-sites-such-as-facebook-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardbaldock.com/?p=651#comment-114</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by RichardBaldock: New blog post: Gold SEO Tips! - How Google rates links from Sites Such as Facebook &amp; Twitter http://ur1.ca/mmif...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by RichardBaldock: New blog post: Gold SEO Tips! &#8211; How Google rates links from Sites Such as Facebook &amp; Twitter <a href="http://ur1.ca/mmif.." rel="nofollow">http://ur1.ca/mmif..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

